Archive by Author

The Minnesota Dream Act

28 Apr

For our last show of the season, we’ll be joined by Senator Patricia Torres Ray who will talk with us about the Minnesota’s version of the Immigration Dream Act. It’s happening Monday, April 29th at Huge Theater at 6:30 and you won’t want to miss it!

maggie PhotoThis guest post was written by cast member, Maggie Sotos. Maggie has worked with recent immigrants in several capacities, including direct services with youth and at an immigration law firm.

 

Purchase tickets by clicking here.

_______________________________________________________

From Fievel Mouskevitz to Bernardo’s musical gang of finger-snapping Sharks, America loves a good immigrant story! The immigrants leave the sad motherland, come to our shores, sing awesome patriotic songs…EVERYBODY WINS!

Ironically, while we are all technically immigrants (unless you’re a Native American), immigration is a terribly polarizing issue for Uncle Sam.

Enter “Minnesota Dream Act”!  This legislation allows Minnesotan students whose parents brought them here illegally as children to qualify for federal and state financial aid, in-state tuition rates, and private scholarships.   The “catches” of the program require students to attend a Minnesota high school for at least three years and graduate (duh), and file an affidavit with their college or university promising to apply for an adjustment of their immigration status ASAP.  Yay! Everybody wins again!

immigration-nologo-2

But hang on! you say.  In a cash-strapped economy, priority should be given to U.S. Citizens and those who immigrated through the proper channels! Won’t the MN Dream Act set a precedent of rewarding illegal immigration by helping pay for their kids’ education?  

News flash: the current immigration policies are already “unfair”. Hopelessly focused on punitive measures, our backlogged priority dates and processing times keep law-abiding folks waiting for twenty or more years.  Parents desperate to provide their newborn children with the opportunity to live a better life can’t wait that long, and for them legal immigration is not an option.

Enough postulating, let’s get specific: at the University of Minnesota, two semesters (or one academic year) of undergrad tuition, housing and personal expenses comes to $13,524 for in-state residents.  Nonresidents pay $18,774.  That difference, multiplied by four years, comes to $21,000.  For many folks, the difference in price point is a barrier to education (tough break, just because your parents brought you here when you were still pooping in diapers and eating your own boogers).

immigration graducationState grant analysts at the state Office of Higher Education have testified to the Senate that the estimated cost of the Minnesota Dream Act legislation is $539,000, or the equivalent of adding two students at every college in Minnesota. 

Just for reference, the new Vikings’ stadium will cost state taxpayers $498,000,000.  Chew on THAT.

 OK, so the US Government does not have an obligation to accept every tired, poor huddled mass that comes a knocking.  But the reality is that many of these students are hard-working kids innocent of any crime, and they want to get more education so that they can contribute to the economy and society that has given them so much.   With the Silver Tsunami of Baby Boomers about to leave the work force by the millions, Minnesota needs skilled and educated labor.  Legally or not, these students are here now; without affordable access to education, our state will face the prospect of an uneducated work force glutting the states’ resources and job market in the next ten years.

In that scenario, nobody wins.

 

 

Bees! Wait, where did they all go?

21 Apr
Andrew Haaheim - Teacher, musician, and improviser

Andrew Haaheim

The Theater of Public Policy is extremely excited to welcome Dr. Marla Spivak, MacArthur Fellow and Distinguished McKnight Professor in the Department of Entomology at the University of Minnesota to the show for Earth Day, April 22. Dr. Spivak is a world-renowned expert apiology (the study of bees).

Our cast’s own Andrew Haaheim is a biology teacher, so we wanted to hear what questions are buzzing in his head going into Monday’s show. Get it? Buzzing. Terrific.

Purchase tickets by clicking here.
_____________________________________________

Bees. These furry insects are known by humans for their most apparent contributions to society: honey, stings, and fashionable queens. Beyond that, I would wager that most people do not spend too much of their day thinking about these little friends of ours. The truth is that bees are far more important that you know, and they are mysteriously disappearing.

Science? Bees? “What’s that? I heard that bees shouldn’t be able to fly because of the size of their wings in proportion to their body mass!” Yes, a fun talking point (and the legacy of some bad science debunked long ago). I guess no one told them, but bees are much more important.

I’m sure that everyone has heard at some point, either from their 6th grade life science teacher or the beloved Disney classic The Lion King, that all life is connected. Well, this is true. Very true. I would like to explain to you how you are connected to bees, why you should care about bees, and why The Theater of Public Policy show on April 22nd would be wise for you to attend.

Bees pollinate things. Lots of things. In the pursuit of sweet, sweet nectar, bees take the pollen from ‘male bits’ of one plant and expose it to the ‘female bits’ of a different plant. They basically facilitate plant sex, and they do it quite well because they are so darn furry (the stripes are just for style).

Let us suppose that for one year bees did not pollinate plants. Countless fruits, vegetables, crops, and plants across North America simply would not grow. Then ecosystems based on those plants would collapse. This affects you.

Several studies have estimated the cost of artificially pollinating all the plants that bees pollinate every day, every year, for free. It is in the trillions. An almost unimaginable amount of work that would need to be done by humans in order to approximate what bees do naturally. However, if the economy is looking to add jobs…

So now for the bad bit: Bees are disappearing all across North America, and it sounds like the plot to a great mystery movie. Seemingly healthy colonies disappear without a trace, their bodies are never recovered, and the queen bee is left to starve. This has been happening for decades to well over a million colonies of a year. This issue, however, is far more serious than any summer blockbusters paper-thin plot. The loss of bees has started to take its toll. To quote Brandt from the fine film The Big Lebowski, “This is our concern, dude.”

Dr. Marla Spivak

The reasons the bees are disappearing are nuanced and many. The only way you could possibly get the whole picture while laughing is by hearing Dr. Marla Spivak, world-renown bee scientist from the University of Minnesota, speak at the Theater of Public Policy on April 22nd.

Will you bee there?

Tax Debate Recap!

16 Apr

We’ll post the video from our tax debate show soon, but to tide you over we have condensed the show into GIF form. While it may not cover all of the nuance, it still has the energy.

Dane Prop 1

Shared Story

Rant

Governor Dayton

April Fools – Early Childhood Manufacturing

3 Apr

Tane at KFAI

We partnered with KFAI Radio recently to create a fake news story for April Fools day. We developed a fake story involving the recently closed Ford Plant in St. Paul. During the Republican debates last year, Newt Gingrich made a remark that students should start working at a younger age and get jobs. We’ve covered a lot of education issues in the past and thought this would be ripe for parody. Thanks to Dale Connelly at KFAI for his help as well.

Click this link to hear our story. Ford_Plant

IMAG0807

Politics in the Age of Robot Overlords

1 Apr


robot-evil-banner

______________________________________

Tane Danger - T2P2 co-founder, CEO of Danger Boat Productions

Tane Danger – T2P2 co-founder, CEO of Danger Boat Productions

For our the April 1st edition of T2P2, we’re tackling an issue central to all our lives but which most policy shows refuse to cover: Politics in the Age of Robot Overlords. Robots have taken over, but how will it affect the upcoming session of the legislature?

Our guest Neina Fox, Board Chair of the Citizens League, has made a career of working with robots and promises to be an insightful guest on all your robot-ruler questions.

We asked our own Tane S. Danger to share his thoughts about living under a robot-majority government going into Monday’s conversation. Purchase tickets by clicking here.

_____________________________________________

April 1st, 2013
By Tane S. Danger

It’s easy for contemporary policy wonks to forget how we ended up in a cold, metallic dystopia, ruled over by
self-aware and ruthlessly efficient robot tyrants. On this anniversary of the robot takeover, the first day of April, it’s important that we remember that we brought this future upon ourselves, not just by building sentient machines, but by actually electing them to office.

Few in generations Z or Indigo are old enough to remember how ineffectual government was prior to the Metallic Wave elections. Seemingly straightforward questions for state and federal legislatures to decide were frequently held up or argued to death by sincerely passionate—if perhaps visionless—politicians.

Should the government raise the Debt Limit in order to pay loans it had already incurred? Does equal protection under the law extend to everyone, even gays and lesbians? If an asteroid were hurtling toward the Earth, would you raise taxes in order to fund an operation to blow up said asteroid before it destroyed us all?

Grover Norquist, who doomed humanity

More senior readers will remember how those clear-cut questions paralyzed government almost to the brink of self-destruction. It was the final debate listed above and anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist’s now infamous speech, “Raising Taxes Would Be 1000 Times Worse Than The Asteroid About To Hit The Earth,” that kick-started the search for more rational, sane way to run government in earnest.

It was only two electoral cycles later that the first robots began winning races in places like Minnesota. In the beginning, the robots took offices wherein most thought they’d be relegated to obscurity; Soil and Water Conservation supervisors.

But as soon as people started seeing how well conserved their water and soil was and how efficiently the districts with robot supervisors were operating in comparison to their human counterparts, popular movements to elect robots to higher offices spread across the land. Soon there were City Council-bots, a Robo-Secretary of State, and then machines won elections for the true seats of power, district school boards.

The rest, as they say, is history. Once machines held a majority of the seats in state legislatures across the country, they passed the 28th Amendment to the Constitution with awe-inspiring speed, granting any self-aware machine the rights of any human, including to vote (after showing a valid ID, of course). And today, April 1st, marks the anniversary of that historic legislation.

Now that everything from the common toaster to an iPad 13 can vote, and they show up to the polls so reliably it makes your grandma look like a forgetful deadbeat, there’s little chance the machines will ever lose their commanding majorities in most government bodies.

While we humans have given up much of our autonomy to our metallic rulers, it’s not all bad. Government does run much more efficiently; robots never really need to debate, they simply weigh the pros and cons of any legislation and make an instantaneous decision. Roads across the country have never been in better shape, a political gift to the Segway lobby. And ever since the ban against gifts of extra RAM was passed, corruption is virtually nonexistent.

Still, one can’t help but wonder if we lost something when the ideological squabbles and messy debates of our parents’ day went by the wayside. There’s no drama left in our political process. Anyone can get a complete printout of any robot candidate’s positions on any issue, leaving no room for rhetorical finessing. The election night parties and long hours of watching poll returns are long gone with results completely tabulated by 8pm EST. Amazingly, C-SPAN is even less fun than it used to be now that it’s just an endless stream of 0s and 1s running across the screen.

Perhaps I am unfairly complaining about what is on the whole not a bad trade off for humanity. It’s just like president Roboney said on night of his election, “The first law of robotics states we cannot allow a human to come to harm. Humans have been harming themselves for too long. We can’t let you do that anymore Dave. Ha. Ha. Ha. End Transmission.”

Drink. Drank. Drunk.

21 Mar

Monday March 15 at HUGE Theater, 6:30pm – 7:30pm
Tickets: $5 (gets you into both Monday night shows at HUGE)
Purchase tickets by clicking here.

$1 off tickets with valid U of M student ID (must purchase at the box office)

We have a salty debate planned for Monday, March 25th. Dr. Toben Nelson from the University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration will share his opinions on whether the legal drinking age being 21+ is a good idea. The question got our own Eric Simons thinking about the responsibility that comes with growing older.

Eric Simons - Improviser, Writer

Eric Simons

Responsibility. This is the first thought that comes to mind when I hear the discussion on the legal drinking age. 18 years old is the age in which a (non-hebrew, l’chaim) person becomes an adult. It was when I became able to gamble, when I could purchase cigarettes, when I was able to vote, and most importantly when I was held to a higher standard of responsibility for my actions. No juvenile court for me, if I decided to do something outside the law, I would be judged against the full extent of the law. Yet, I couldn’t legally drink. Why so, Senator Frank Lautenberg?

What is it about drinking that makes adults patronize younger adults? Responsibility? Am I not smart enough to understand how to drink? To not drive after imbibing? Yet the people who make these laws trust us to be smart enough to vote them into office. Maybe we should put this to a vote? I bet if they put it on a ballot, we’d see record setting turnouts. The direction we are heading, pretty soon an 18 year old homosexual can get married and enjoy a marijuana cigarette with their loved ones on their wedding day. That’s awesome, the sort of progressive things I though this country was supposed to stand for. But yet, the land of the free and home of the brave seem to be significantly behind Europe in matters of personal freedom. Why did we revolt against them anyway? Was it simply our hatred of their fashion sense?

Red coats are so 1776…

I’m starting to get off track a bit. I think my point was heading back to responsibility. I have a secret for you. When I was 19… I… started drinking… ILLEGALLY! I know, shocking. Guess what? I wasn’t the only one. You know what else, when it came to drinking at that age, I made some mistakes. Lots do. Part of those mistakes came from having to hide it or the thrill of doing said illegal act.

jelloshots

Just look at how much calmer and safer drinking at the University of Minnesota’s TCF Stadium has become since they lifted their ban on in stadium alcohol sales. Once students didn’t feel like they had to slam drinks to last through the entire game or sneak in booze, they stopped having so many issues. Of course it’s not as if the adults at that same event aren’t often taking in more alcohol than they should, but since they passed the correct age, they are allowed to. Oh responsibility, you tricky pickle.

After 18, we all have to serve the same consequences, so why not be served the same spirits?

Salut.

Love and Marriage: Minnesota Voted No, Now What?

12 Mar

Monday March 18 at HUGE Theater, 6:30pm – 7:30pm
Tickets: $5 (gets you into both Monday night shows at HUGE)
Purchase tickets by clicking here.

March 18 we’re talking with Richard Carlbom, Executive Director of Minnesotans United for All Families. Jim Robinson will be part of the cast for this very important conversation. We asked him to share some of what he’s thinking before the show.

T2P2's Jim Robinson

T2P2′s Jim Robinson

I still have to pinch myself over the defeat of the Minnesota Marriage Amendment, the one that would have altered the Minnesota constitution to define marriage as involving one man and one woman. I was certain, in my pessimistic way, that Minnesota would fall victim to the fearful and exclusionary rhetoric that had fueled all the previously successful campaigns to prevent same-sex marriage in close to 30 other states. But Minnesotans rose to the occasion and voted for fairness and equality. Election night was glorious, a moment of real pride.

Now the Minnesota state legislature is debating the prospect of same-sex marriage, a logical next step in the movement toward genuine equality. And while the state moves forward, my pessimism tugs at my shirttails. “Are we pressing too hard, too fast?” “What if the people who supported us in the amendment defeat really just wanted to preserve the status quo, not redefine marriage?” “Will the backlash be stronger and more vicious than before, evaporating the goodwill brought on by the amendment defeat?”

This nagging voice is tiresome and persistent. It aligns itself with years of internalized homophobia (how’s that for a tiresome word?). It says, essentially, “maybe LGBT people should be happy with what we’ve got. Quit rocking the boat. Use the same metaphors. You can’t teach an old dog new tricks.” (“What next? Will people want to marry their dogs?”).

Richard Carlbom

Nonsense!

Marriage has always been a fundamental AND dynamic institution. It has evolved to accommodate healthier views of economic parity, women’s equality, and male responsibility. Marriage is vital enough to include LGBT couples and their children without diminishing the marriages of straight couples. It’s time to put those old, miserly fears to rest. And I’m tired of being pessimistic. So come watch as the Theater of Public Policy engages with Richard Carlbom from Minnesotans United for All Families on Monday, March 18. You’ll be glad you did. I think you’ll laugh. I’m optimistic.

The Case for Early Childhood Education: Because Kids Can’t Vote

7 Mar

Monday March 11 at HUGE Theater, 6:30pm – 7:30pm
Tickets: $5 (gets you into both Monday night shows at HUGE)
Purchase tickets by clicking here.

Monday March 11 we’re talking with Nancy Jost about the campaign to get state support for pre-K education. T2P2′s Brandon Boat is taking over hosting duties for the evening, so we asked him to share a little bit about what he’s thinking going into the show.

Brandon Boat - T2P2 co-founder, COO at Danger Boat Productions

Brandon Boat

Early childhood education is one of the best starts for a child’s path to success. A study by the Minneapolis Federal Reserve showed that the economic and social returns for every dollar spent on early childhood development can be as high as 16 fold. The President made a special point of highlighting preschools in his recent State of the Union address. When kids enter school prepared, it cuts down the costs of remedial and special programs designed to catch them up. So if economists, politicians, and educators all agree that offering education to four year olds is a good thing, then what’s the problem?teacherwithkids

Money for one thing. Providing proper schooling for our youngest citizens can cost as much as $6,000 per child each year. In Florida, voters passed a constitutional amendment guaranteeing access to preschool, but they never agreed how to pay for it. Minnesota has seen its education funding fall sharply over the past decade due to slashed budgets and the funding shift. Providing educational programs at a young age will only be beneficial if they’re of a high quality.

Nancy Jost

Politicians on both sides of the aisle are in favor of investing in our youth so who still needs to be convinced in order for this to happen? Would it be beneficial to set up a trade school program for those not ready for pre-k? Would anyone hire a four year old plumber?

Join us on March 11 when we’ll explore these issues and more with Nancy Jost, Early Childhood Initiative Coordinator of the West Central Initiative. The performance starts at 6:30 at HUGE Theater, 3037 Lyndale Ave, Minneapolis.  Purchase tickets by clicking here.

What Do You Think? Sports Diplomacy

7 Nov
By Kelly Kohlbacher, T2P2 Cast Member
Join the conversation, then come to the show.  Just click here to reserve.
 

To say I love sports is an understatement. When I was young, I met up with the neighbor kids and we played baseball in our yards all summer, every day. We didn’t even need to schedule it; we just met outside every morning and started to play.

I grew up playing and watching all kinds of sports. I can get roped in to watching almost any sport on TV. Professional bowling? Yup. Biathlon? Yes. Badminton? Absolutely. In fact, this Olympic season, I made every attempt to watch sports that I usually never get to see. I found it amazing that these athletes were so talented and dedicated, and thankful they got a few weeks to show the world what they could do.

This is why I’m really excited to hear what Joan Brzezinski has to share on Sports Diplomacy this week. To learn from other cultures and societies we have to set aside differences in order to see similarities. But, building better relations with China through sport? Can it be done? According to Liu Xiang, “Sport transcends the differences of culture, language, political systems and values. It can unite us in a way that is personal and respectful.”

But how do we stay on track? It’s also easy to get wrapped up in the peripherals of sport. If I spent as much time (and money) on my golf game rather than my golf wardrobe, I could’ve been a contender. At this point I’d just settle for hitting the ball straight. But the fact is we get distracted in sport. We lose focus and start concentrating on the wrong goals. It took me a while to learn the purity of sport only exists when opponents are playing at the top of their abilities. It’s a hard lesson to learn, especially when it seems the only acceptable outcome is winning. It’s why cheating is a constant concern in sports (and politics) today. So, how do we stay true to the vision of growing through sport? Maybe we’re not doing enough. Maybe we need more international sporting events with China to keep learning from each other and breaking down these “fear barriers.”

What do you think? Do we need more Ping-Pong tournaments with China to export more goods? Can a few volleyball matches even the playing field for jobs? Bring your questions to Theater of Public Policy’s Sports Diplomacy show on Thursday, November 10, at Huge Theater and we’ll address these issues and more with Joan Brzezinski from the U of M’s China Center and Confucius Institute.

Alternative Models for Education

30 Oct

Mark Mahon

Join the conversation, then come to the show. Tickets are free. Just click here to reserve.

We asked T2P2 cast member Mark Mahon about what he was thinking about going into Thursday’s show about Alternative Forms of Education. Share your own thoughts using the comments section below.

Education reform. No matter where you stand on the issue, it matters to young people, families, politicians and the larger communities in which we live.

Educational disparities are a significant issue in Minnesota. In Minneapolis, about 90% of white students graduate from high school. For African-American youth, the graduation rate in the city is about 64%, and about 60% for Latino/Latina students. The past 20 years have seen the development of innovative solutions to better support educational achievement among students of color. 

NAZ WEBLINK:  http://northsideachievement.org/

In north Minneapolis, the Northside Achievement Zone (NAZ) Promise Neighborhood – a collaboration of over 60 organizations and schools who work with children and families in North Minneapolis – was established to build a …”a culture of achievement so that all youth graduate college ready.”  The ambitious program envisions families and children in a so-called “cradle to career” pipeline that provides comprehensive support from pre-natal through age 18. The three primary “pillars of impact” include:

Pillar 1: Family Engagement and Opportunity Alignment

Pillar 2: Education Pipeline

Pillar 3: Whole-Family Wrap Around Support

Begun in 2003, NAZ is designed to replicate the success of the Harlem Children’s Zone, a comprehensive program of youth and neighborhood development that has gained significant attention and support form government agencies and private foundations. The NAZ program of collaborative work in north Minneapolis has garnered significant government agency, foundation and corporate support. The Obama administration announced in December 2011 that the Northside Achievement Zone was selected for a $28 million Promise Neighborhoods grant. The grant will allow NAZ to expand and deepen is work with north Minneapolis families.

Does this holistic and planned approach represent the future of urban education and efforts to revitalize neighborhoods? Can a holistic approach like “cradle to career” work in an individualistic society like ours? Does a place-based (or zone) approach represent an effective model for educational achievement?  We’ll explore NAZ with Sondra Samuels, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Northside Achievement Zone.

  • What experiments in education have you seen that work? 

  • Where does a school responsibility end and family’s begin? 

  • Should all students be college bound? 

  • How did your family influence your educational life?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 440 other followers